tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23326860.post2842011546730222197..comments2011-02-14T19:38:02.664ZLuíshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04787580931645750027noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23326860.post-87197876037150044772011-02-14T19:38:02.664Z2011-02-14T19:38:02.664ZI don&#39;t think the visualizations were made public. Someone else <a href="http://zslug.wordpress.com/2011/02/09/meeting-1-report-audio-und-slideware-of-hans-talk/#comments" rel="nofollow">has asked</a> already; I suppose you could try too.<br /><br />Anyway, you say that you &quot;regard the wireless packet loss burst problem as completely intractable for long TCP links without using proxies.&quot; IIUC, that&#39;s the problem Teclo is tackling, with good results, it seems. :-) (I&#39;m assuming that you&#39;re referring to HTTP proxies, etc.)Luíshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04787580931645750027noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23326860.post-53547326399140408132011-02-14T18:46:36.154Z2011-02-14T18:46:36.154ZI was discussing the effect of wireless on TCP/ip last week on the bufferbloat mailing list.<br /><br />https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/2011-February/000068.html<br /><br />He had visualizations? donde?Davehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16115281578739979183noreply@blogger.com