tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23326860.post3629183070751006764..comments2007-11-28T12:29:08.463ZLuíshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04787580931645750027noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23326860.post-45162780158560791622007-08-30T12:14:11.155+01:002007-08-30T12:14:11.155+01:00That's a good point, and I've considered that. It'd require more changes to the majority of the programs that might benefit from trivial-features, though, since CLs do agree on a fair chunk of the names.<BR/><BR/>Also, should at some point in the future CLs agree on all the names, the trivial-features library can simply disappear without the need to rename the :TF-* symbols.Luíshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04787580931645750027noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23326860.post-5330221707140219162007-08-30T07:13:20.004+01:002007-08-30T07:13:20.004+01:00Hello,<BR/><BR/>wouldn't be better to use new names (e.g., prefixed by tf-) for the features handled by tf? I can imagine that an old package relies on the "native" set of features and is confused when one is added or removed...zellerinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16595539769788665725noreply@blogger.com